In summary: if you can have a tool that you can open rhino files, review concurrently with team, and mark it up, you have something very exciting and very useful. Also a modeler should be able to be still in rhino and send updates to the meeting, so live-linking to Rhino makes even more sense, tools like Rhino.Inside let you do that. The idea of going to a ‘cloud’ lobby looking for stuff is not very appealing, and adds a lot of friction and cognitive load IMO. In future builds you can have comparative sessions between models (flipping them like layers on-off), etc.Īll this needs to be done simply: A little toolbar/or ‘watch folder’ that handles all this bureaucratic steps between points A and B, and all the round-tripping. So you would need to have a way to send 3-5 file to a Gravity sketch session, review/mark up each and then get back to work in rhino. And as in any real world meeting goes, there would be more than one rhino file involved. Then of course do the round-trip back to Rhino. In your case, offering a way to bring one Rhino model (I say one, as a starting point) and meet as a team, walk around it, having such model displaying all the same materials/layers/names that it had in Rhino, and be able to mark-up/sketch annotations would be really useful. We do a lot of modeling work, and we do a lot of VR work, and are very comfortable having VR being a viewing/presentation/review mode (what it does best), and then use the tools that are best for each topology type to do the modeling work. In the case of our team we don’t see a lot of value in modeling in VR. Very impressive work Seyi, this is showing great potential that could be more expansive and inclusive to your current core value proposition.Īs you know we users are all different and have different preferences and needs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |